Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Comparison of overhead, conventional and the alternations of the two methods of spray application in the control of coffee leaf rust using contact and systemic fungicides :

by Maithia, A.S.K.
Publisher: Nov 1983Subject(s): ENFERMEDADES DE LAS PLANTAS | ENFERMEDADES FUNGOSAS | ROYA | HEMILEIA | CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES | CONTROL QUIMICO | FUNGICIDAS | METODOS DE APLICACION | HEMILEIA VASTATRIX | ENFERMEDADES FOLIARES | FUNGICIDAS SISTEMICOS | FUNGICIDAS CUPRICOS In: Kenya Coffee (Kenia) v. 48(570) p. 239-250Summary: Copper Nordox (Cuprous Oxide) and Sicarol (Pyracarbolid) applied by the conventional or the alternating of the conventional and the Overhead methods of spray application were superior to the Overhead method in coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix B. and Br.) control However, in almost all cases, Sicarol appeared less effective than Copper Nordox in the control of the same disease. The effectiveness of the Conventional and the alternating the Conventional and the Overhead methods of spray application in coffee leaf rust control was attributed to the effective distribution of fungicides on both sides of leaves. There was a time saving factor during the spraying when the two methods of spray application were alternated. The implication of these results are discused
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

++8 tab. 12 ref. Sum. (En)

Copper Nordox (Cuprous Oxide) and Sicarol (Pyracarbolid) applied by the conventional or the alternating of the conventional and the Overhead methods of spray application were superior to the Overhead method in coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix B. and Br.) control However, in almost all cases, Sicarol appeared less effective than Copper Nordox in the control of the same disease. The effectiveness of the Conventional and the alternating the Conventional and the Overhead methods of spray application in coffee leaf rust control was attributed to the effective distribution of fungicides on both sides of leaves. There was a time saving factor during the spraying when the two methods of spray application were alternated. The implication of these results are discused

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer